<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Is The Calorie Theory Of Fat Loss Scientifically Valid When?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fat-smash-diet.net/2009/06/how-is-the-calorie-theory-of-fat-loss-scientifically-valid-when/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fat-smash-diet.net/2009/06/how-is-the-calorie-theory-of-fat-loss-scientifically-valid-when/</link>
	<description>Fat Loss Natural &#124; Resource for Fat Loss and Fast Diet tips exercise information.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:53:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://fat-smash-diet.net/2009/06/how-is-the-calorie-theory-of-fat-loss-scientifically-valid-when/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fat-smash-diet.net/2009/06/how-is-the-calorie-theory-of-fat-loss-scientifically-valid-when/#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>NO lorbell They WERE. The variables were controlled</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO lorbell They WERE. The variables were controlled</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free WP Yahoo Plugin</title>
		<link>http://fat-smash-diet.net/2009/06/how-is-the-calorie-theory-of-fat-loss-scientifically-valid-when/comment-page-1/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>Free WP Yahoo Plugin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fat-smash-diet.net/2009/06/how-is-the-calorie-theory-of-fat-loss-scientifically-valid-when/#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>There is no way that all of the mice could have been genetically identical. Only identical twins (or triplets, etc) have exactly the same DNA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no way that all of the mice could have been genetically identical. Only identical twins (or triplets, etc) have exactly the same DNA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

